By 2014...
- The homicide rate was 30.6 percent of its 1980 peak;
- The rape rate was 42.3 percent of its 1980 peak;
- The robbery rate was 30.2 percent of its 1992 peak;
- The aggravated assault rate was 38.4 percent of its 1990 peak;
- The burglary rate was 22.9 percent of its 1980 peak;
- The arson rate was 15.4 percent of its 1980 peak;
- And the total violent crime rate was 35.6 percent of its 1992 peak.
Crime dropped this fast thanks to case decisions by appellate courts, statutes enacted by the Legislature, and initiatives approved by the electorate. These legal reforms reshaped the legal landscape and generated “Phase Three” in the history of California criminal law. (Mitchell Keiter, How Evolving Social Values Have Shaped (And Reshaped) California Criminal Law (2009) 4 California Legal History 393.)
These changes are threatened by changes new laws and leadership. Through appellate advocacy before the Supreme Courts of the United States and California, Amicus Populi works to preserve the public safety benefits achieved over the last generation — for the next.
Director Biography
Mitchell Keiter is a certified appellate law specialist, with his own civil appellate practice at Keiter Appellate Law. He started his career as the youngest Deputy Attorney General in the California Attorney General’s Criminal Division. He then worked at the California Supreme Court as a Chambers Attorney, before becoming a law professor teaching criminal law, criminal procedure, evidence, and appellate advocacy. His publications have been cited by the Parliament of Victoria. Australia, the Harvard Law Review, the Wisconsin Supreme Court and the Maryland Court of Special Appeals (its highest court).
He has argued six cases on behalf of the People of the State of California, and has filed briefs in ten more. He filed his most recent amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief on behalf of former California Senator Ray Haynes, who had been instrumental in limiting the exculpatory effect of the intoxication defense in California. The brief successfully urged the Supreme Court to affirm the conviction of Joaquin Soto, who broke into an apartment and stabbed Israel Ramirez to death as Ramirez’ family hid in the bedroom. Soto contended he should be guilty of only manslaughter because he had consumed so much methamphetamine, marijuana, and alcohol that he honestly, albeit unreasonably, perceived and acted on a need to defend himself against his Ramirez. The Supreme Court affirmed the conviction by a 5-2 vote. The result adopted a position urged by Keiter in 1999.
Articles
Law Review:
History of California Criminal Law
Felony-murder
Indirect homicides (Provocative Act doctrine)
Transferred intent and dangerous homicides
Intoxication Defense
Just Say No Excuse: The Rise and Fall of the Intoxication Defense (1997)
Newspaper:
Proposition 57
Voters are free to rein in Prop 57, L.A./S.F. Daily Journal, Jan. 23, 2019
The Unlockable Prison Gate
Los Angeles/San Francisco Daily Journal, April 27,2026
Death Penalty/Life Imprisonment Without Parole
Death penalty articles highlight conundrum for Californians, L.A./S.F. Daily Journal, Nov. 8, 2016
Proposition 34 will undercut justice, L.A./S.F. Daily Journal, Nov. 2, 2012
Why Should Murderers Get Parole?, L.A. Times, May 23, 1995
Terrorism/Human Shields
Who caused the death of Kayla Mueller?, L.A./S.F. Daily Journal, Apr. 27, 2015
Intoxication Defense
Excuses for Intoxicated Killers, S.F. Chronicle, Aug. 8, 1995
Firearm Enhancements (“10-20-Life”)